It all started with novelist and children’s author Michael Morpurgo, who always wanted to write a tale set against the Great War.

World War I is perhaps the least talked-about conflict of the 20th century, leaving in its wake a world forever changed and a generation tasked to rebuild from ashes.

For a long time, Morpurgo had looked for an original way to write about the war. But it wasn’t until he met an aged veteran in a bar that he found his way in–inspiration sparked when he heard the man talk with passion not about his fellow soldiers but about the incredibly heroic horses with whom he served.

Michael Morpurgo
Michael Morpurgo

With his wife, Morpurgo had founded Farms for City Children, a charity where inner city children live and work on rural farms for a week.

In December 2010, Morpurgo recounted the event that convinced him he could write the book:

One of the kids who came to the farm from Birmingham, a boy called Billy, the teachers warned me that he had a stammer and told me not to ask him direct questions because it would terrify him if he had to be made to speak because he doesn’t speak…I came in the last evening into the yard behind this big Victorian house where they all live, and there he was, Billy, standing in his slippers by the stable door and the lantern above his head, talking. Talking, talking, talking, to the horse. And the horse, Hebe, had her head just over the top of the stable, and she was listening; that’s what I noticed, that the ears were going, and I knew she knew that she had to stay there whilst this went on, because this kid wanted to talk, and the horse wanted to listen—this was a two way thing…I went and got the teachers, and brought them up through the vegetable garden, and we stood there in the shadows, and we listened to Billy talking, and they were completely amazed how this child who couldn’t get a word out—the words were simply flowing. All the fear had gone, and there was something about the intimacy of this relationship, the trust building up between boy and horse, that I found enormously moving, and I thought: Well yes, you could write a story about the First World War through the eyes of a horse, and yes, the horse didn’t understand every word, but she knew it was important for her to stand there and be there for this child.”

Another inspiration for the book, after meeting the veterans and seeing Billy with Hebe the horse, was an old oil painting that Morpurgo’s wife Clare had been left: “It was a very frightening and alarming painting, not the sort you’d want to hang on a wall. It showed horses during the First World War charging into barbed wire fences. It haunted me.” 

The painting was by F. W. Reed and was dated 1917, and showed a British cavalry charge on German lines, with horses entangled in barbed wire. Morpurgo wrote a fictionalised version of this painting in his “Author’s Note” at the start of the book. In his version, the painting shows a red bay with a white cross on his forehead, and the painting bears the legend: “Joey. Painted by Captain James Nicholls, autumn 1914.”

“Here I was listening to this old man who had tears in his eyes talking about a relationship he had with a horse on the Western Front decades ago,” the novelist recalls.

“I learned that these horses were doing so much more than simply carrying soldiers or gun carriages. They deeply mattered to people.”  That initial conversation led Morpurgo into his own personal hunt for research, in which he discovered that a remarkable 1 million horses valiantly went into battle with the British during WWI and only 62,000 animals returned.  He learned how vital horses were on all sides of the war, giving soldiers from every country an invisible but common thread. He explored poignant paintings and read historical accounts of how horses sacrificed, suffered and committed acts of bravery–just like their human companion.

It first became a well-loved family book in 1982, then an innovative stage play that still takes audiences by storm, saw another incarnation in its most visceral medium yet when it was adapted into a film, and on November 7, 2015, by special invitation, award-winning Sherborne Abbey Festival has arranged for National Theatre puppeteers and the magnificent life-size horse ‘Joey’ to make a guest appearance at the performance of War Horse Only Remembered at Sherborne Abbey, with author Michael Morpurgo reading the powerful and deeply moving story of young Albert and his beloved horse Joey, joined by acclaimed musicians John Tams and Barry Coope, who accompany him with the rousing yet haunting songs specially composed by John Tams.

Published in 1982 as a story for young adults, the book was quickly embraced by readers around the world and was a runner-up for the prestigious Whitbread Award.


In 2007, when the novel was adapted into a mesmerizing stage play at London’s National Theatre by Nick Stafford, audiences went mad for it and for its themes of human-animal friendship, the power of endurance and the way hope for the future stays with us when all appears lost.

Director Steven Spielberg (far right) observes Jeremy Irvine (left) rehearse a scene with Joey on the set

Steven Spielberg believes a big part of the appeal of “War Horse” lies in the deep link that remains from those times when horses were so integral to the aims of human societies. “Horses were the primary means of human transportation for centuries. Great armies fought on horses to great achievements. We got around on horseback, horses pulled fire engines and buggies,” he notes. “But with the advent of the motorcar, horses started to be relegated back to the fields or to sports and they no longer had the same relevance to the necessities of society. And yet, today they still feel very special to us.  I think somewhere in our DNA, there will always be respect and admiration for horses.”

The journey begins on the cusp of WWI, as an English farming family buys a fiery hunter colt at auction despite not having the funds to pay for him. Named Joey, the horse seems to be nothing but a loss for struggling Ted and Rosie Narracott,  but their son Albert is determined to tame and train him, making the most of Joey’s enthralling spirit, speed and affection. The two are inseparable, but when war breaks out, they have pulled apart as Joey is sold from under him and heads to the front as the mount of a dashing British cavalry officer.

Says Spielberg: “To me, ‘War Horse’ is a timeless story about the sacrifices of love–about the sacrifices a boy makes in a time of war to find his horse and the sacrifices the horse makes just trying to survive this dark episode in history. Throughout it all, their destinies are entwined.”

“I thought the story was absolutely fascinating, and I was transported. In my mind, it was a very honest story. I saw it as a movie for families–the journey of a boy and a horse who were once so close and whose destinies drive them apart. I hope this story will bring people together through this shared experience; its heart can be felt in every country.”

When Spielberg took on the project, Morpurgo could hardly believe it.  He was thrilled with the direction, which was as unique to the screen as the theatre version was to its form. “There was an incredible meeting of minds with Steven. We’re both storytellers who are fascinated by how stories can expand and grow. Steven told the story in his own way, with more depth and breadth,” says the author.

The filmmakers next turned their attention to adapting the novel. First, they brought in British screenwriter Lee Hall, who wrote the triumphant Billy Elliot, and then, to add more layers, they brought in another Brit, Richard Curtis, whose films include Love Actually, Four Weddings and a Funeral and Notting Hill as well as the TV series Blackadder, a comedy set in the trenches of World War I.

Curtis notes that the story has a strong connection to the world right now. “With the financial recession, and the threat of terrorism, that question of how individuals survive in a big dangerous world is something that we are all more aware of right now,” he notes.

But to bring those links out, he had to find answers to two complicated questions: How could Joey be the very centre of the story even though he has no voice; and how could the narrative stay with Joey’s quest for a reunion and not get mired in the muck and chaos of the war? “The war had to be a presence which you always know is there, a threat, but not the central subject,” says Curtis. “The challenge was achieving a balance–not diminishing the horror of the war but not eclipsing what is a very moving story about people bound together by a horse.”

As he discussed the nuances of the screenplay with Spielberg, Curtis also was put in mind of another subtle influence. “I think somewhere in Steven’s mind was the cinematic tradition of the Western. You start out in a lovely homestead where they’re pulling the water and there’s a friendly goose, and then suddenly there’s the foreboding sense that something bad is coming just over the horizon,” he observes.

When the darkness of war arrives in Devon, the resulting chaos cleaves Albert and Joey apart, but Spielberg and Curtis discussed coming up with a narrative device to tie the two friends together even as they each go off on disparate adventures. This became the pennant Albert ties to Joey’s reins the day he leaves his side.

For Spielberg, that simple object became a visual through-line. “I wanted to find a way to tie up all of the film’s stories with one thing that becomes a kind of unifying force and that is the father’s war pennant,” he says. “Joey takes with him this memento of their relationship and it goes from story to story until the very end. It was very important to me that there be that kind of visual talisman. The campaign pennant connects Joey not only to all these other stories but it also connects the boy to his father and home.”

Adds Curtis: “Steven is very skilled at weaving visual markers through a far-ranging story, and the pennant is very important because Albert’s father brought it back from his time at war–and now it becomes the one constant all the way through the film until it finally is returned back to where it came from. Our hope was that it would be a little, beautiful, shining thread through all that they go through.”

No matter what tweaks of plot they made, the writers always kept Joey at the heart of things.  “He represents all of our innocence thrown into an unbelievable cataclysm,” sums up Hall. “In his perspective, all the complexities are stripped back to the simple, and it becomes a very human story.”

Read the screenplay

A Horse’s Odyssey Home

How do you unfold a world-wandering tale of love, war, fortitude and hope when your main character is an innocent village colt in search of kindness, friendship and a way home?

Newcomer Jeremy Irvine in the film War Horse

That challenge instantly compelled Steven Spielberg when he encountered Michael Morpurgo’s novel “War Horse.” The book presented an inspiring legend, but it was cut from a different cloth than most. All manner of stories have emerged from war–stories of romance, heroism, moral dilemmas, of divided families transcending hardship. But here was a story of wartime as it had never been experienced: through the journey of an animal propelled into battle with no malice or side to take, fueled only by the burning desire to live and return to the ones he loves.

To do the story justice would be a creative and technical feat, one that hooked into Spielberg’s penchant for chronicling the human condition. It was one that, for all its scope, would have little to do with special effects and everything to do with a more hand-crafted cinematic style, working humanely and intelligently with remarkable animals and engaging human performances, and guiding a devoted crew to overlay a triumph of the spirit atop an unforgettably rugged landscape of conflict. “War Horse” is about classical movie storytelling, weaving a chain of individual stories into an intricate canvas portraying the power of hope in the toughest of times.

The novel had been told with the simple power of allegory. The play, which Spielberg first saw in London at the urging of his long-time producer Kathleen Kennedy (who has produced four decades worth of Spielberg’s seminal films), was emotionally transporting with its whimsical use of towering yet bare-boned horse puppets. But Spielberg immediately understood he would have to find his own visual path to bring the story fully alive on the screen. He took off at a galloping pace.

“The puppets were magnificent on stage, but I knew that if we were going to tell the story, it had to be with real horses,” Spielberg says. “I loved the book also, but it is told from Joey’s point of view and you even hear Joey’s thoughts. I knew that was not an avenue that would work for the film, though it allowed me to understand the importance of telling the story from different viewpoints.”

Following a different track, Spielberg envisioned the film emerging from the tradition of the odyssey–the mythic journey that propels a youthful hero into the dangerous world only to return with hard-won wisdom and a fresh view of life. Only this time, the traveller would have the perspective of a different species silently, yet soulfully, witnessing humanity at its most troubled yet inspirational.

Structurally, the film became a study in shifting moods that lead into one another–the rough-hewn, the almost storybook village of Joey’s youth gives way to the shock and adrenaline rush of a brave new mechanized battlefield, which gives way to an idyllic French farm full of pastoral pleasures, which unravels into the pandemonium of the trenches and the desolate mists of No Man’s Land, all of which only reinforces the driving memory of the village where Joey’s journey began, and to which he strives to return.

Courage is what keeps Joey and Albert going through four danger-filled years apart, and it is courage that becomes a theme woven through the entire texture and fabric of the film. “I think ‘War Horse’ has a lot to say about courage–and about doing things not just for yourself but for the sake of those you love. That theme comes through in many different ways,” Spielberg notes.

He continues: “Albert and Joey have a tenacious belief in one another. It all begins when they attempt together to plough this impossibly stony, infertile field in Devon, before the war. That creates such a synergy and empathic collaboration between horse and boy that when they are separated by the war, I think the audience senses that at some point there is going to be a date with destiny. And when that date occurs, you see that out, of the chaos, something wonderful happens.”

Indeed, everywhere that Joey winds up in his journey, he finds people and animals giving everything they’ve got to the possibility of survival. From the start the idea of moving seamlessly from one compelling story to the next, all through Joey’s experiences, was intriguing to Spielberg. “I don’t think I’ve ever worked before in this kind of episodic format, with miniature stories all coming together into a larger tale,” he observes.  “Characters come and go as Joey passes through all these lives, and we get to see how each of the characters imprint themselves on Joey–and how Joey affected them.”

Whether those characters are British, French or German, Spielberg was interested in the basic humanity at the root of their actions. “War Horse” never concerns itself with identifying an enemy as people from every side find solace and connection with Joey. “The film doesn’t take sides as to who is right or who is wrong,” says Spielberg. “It’s really about how the characters relate to this horse.  Horses have no politics; their main concern is for the care of their charges.  And that is a very important thing that gives the story its humanity amidst the war.”

Another source of fascination for Spielberg in the story are the mysteries of the powerful human bond with nature. He himself lives with horses and has seen firsthand how close they can get to their human companions. Now, he wanted to expose the hearts of horses as they had not been seen on screen before–in all their pure, primal feeling and nobility.

“I have lived with horses for 15 years, and I’ve gotten to know how expressive they are,” the director says. “But movies don’t often spend time on what horses are feeling. In the ‘Indiana Jones’ movies, for example, my job was to focus on Indiana Jones, not his trusted steed. But in the course of making ‘War Horse,’ I was amazed at how the horses were able to emote so tremendously. In the play, the puppets were really able to bring the emotion of the horses to the audience because they were puppets, but I wanted to do that with real horses in the motion picture.”

A long-time history buff, Spielberg was well aware that the tests faced by both horses and soldiers in WWI were some of the most harrowing in history. Known as “the war to end all wars” because no one could imagine going through it again, it marked a seismic shift from the chivalry and honour of warfare past to the dehumanization and mass casualties of modern weaponry. But Spielberg determined from the beginning that he would use a truthful restraint that would keep the film anchored in history without ever becoming graphic. “What was on my mind was to make a very honest story,” the director comments.  “But I was careful to pull back in ways I would not have on ‘Saving Private Ryan’ or on our miniseries ‘Band of Brothers’ and ‘The Pacific.’ I wanted the journey of Albert and his horse to be an authentic, shared experience for families.”

Creating that shared experience would also become a reunion for Spielberg with a community of collaborators who have helped to make his wide-ranging productions so culturally influential.  “All my stalwart family members, across so many years and covering so many movies, came together to make ‘War Horse’ with me,” he says.  “It was a great part of this experience.”

For cast and crew, it was the perfect marriage of artist to the story. Sums up co-screenwriter Lee Hall:  “This is a story where the main character has no words, and Steven has the amazing gift of being able to tell the grandest story through the simplest means and make you care.  Throughout all his work there are characters who are larger than life, who are different from us, but who we pour our hearts and identification into.”

There was also a strong sense of history–and its forward trajectory–that permeated the production.  “There was a real sense of respect for the fact that people lived through these events,” says Richard Curtis. “There was so much integrity to the design and I think Steven wanted to be as honest and emotionally true as possible, not romanticizing it, but trying to create an authentic experience, yet always with the possibility for Joey and Albert to make it back home.”

Known as the Great War, WWI was fought between July 1914 and November 1918 as the delicate balance of power between European empires fell apart.

The Allies (Britain, France, Russia, Belgium, Serbia, Italy, Japan, Greece) fought the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, The Ottoman Empire).  The U.S. entered the war in 1917 on the Allies’ side.

It was the first war in history to be fought on three continents.

It was the first war to use automatic artillery, mustard gas and mechanized tanks.

9.7 million soldiers and 6.7 million civilians were killed worldwide in four years of war.

More than 200,000 men perished in the trenches of the Western Front.

The war introduced unprecedented use of animals in warfare, including millions of horses and hundreds of thousands of dogs.

It was the last war to feature major cavalry charges, but with the arrival of automatic artillery and trench warfare, the use of cavalry became rare, and horses were used more as “beasts of burden” in rough terrain.

WWI was later called “the war to end all wars” because it seemed impossible that such a devastating event would ever be repeated.

When the war was declared in Britain in August of 1914, most of the populace believed it would last a few weeks or months at most and all the men would be home by Christmas.

Most soldiers who fought in the war were between ages 17 and 40, although many lied about their ages to join up.

The Western Front of the war was a line of trenches that crossed Europe, from the Belgian coast to the Swiss border, passing through much of France, where infamous battles were fought at Ypres, Verdun and the Somme.

After an armistice was signed in 1918, troops began to withdraw from the Western Front.  Surviving soldiers and horses, like Albert and Joey, headed back to their villages and to a world changed forever, carrying the hope for lasting peace.

“I believe that every soldier who ever had anything to do with a horse or mule has come to love them for what they are and the grand work they have done and are doing in and out of death zones.”–Captain Sidney Galtrey, “The Horse and The War,” 1918

Throughout human history, animals have accompanied soldiers into battle, their natural, wild instincts recruited to serve human aims. The first mounted cavalries appeared in 1000 BC in Assyria, the great conqueror Hannibal travelled with a phalanx of armoured elephants and the Roman Empire trained “war pigs” whose ferocity was a legend. But it was during WWI that literally millions of animals became an integral part of military operations–living, dying and surviving right next to the young soldiers, many of whom had left behind beloved pets and farm animals, on the battlefields.

Dogs and birds carried messages, camels and mules hauled equipment and even house cats were used to reduce the rat population in trenches. Still, the animal species that sacrificed the most in the Great War was the horse – with somewhere between 4 and 8 million perishing on all sides.  Horses of all types served in the war, from large draft horses to the show hunters like Joey, favoured by the cavalry, but as the war drew on, any horse available was commandeered.  Conditions were extremely difficult for them. Just like the men around them, they faced automatic artillery, poison gas, freezing winters, rampant disease, lack of food and sheer exhaustion and shock from being driven so hard. At times during WWI, as many as 1,000 horses a day arrived from Britain to replace those who had been lost.  (American horses also served in the war, with 182,000 headed overseas and 60,000 perishing.)

Yet for the soldiers, the horses that kept going day after day became a great source of solace and inspiration. Those who rode or worked with horses bonded deeply with their charges, moved by the animals’ stoic work ethic and willingness to attempt the most unimaginable feats without complaint.

The horse would never again be called upon at such a level in wartime. Horses did continue to be a part of military campaigns in WWII, used as a means of transport in rough terrain and, occasionally, as cavalry. Finally recognizing their contributions, Britain instituted the Dickin Medal in 1943 to be presented to those military animals displaying “conspicuous gallantry or devotion to duty.”

Today, few military organizations utilize horses in battle (save for Sudan’s Janjaweed), though cities the world over maintain the war horse’s ancestors: mounted police forces. While the individual horses that gave so much of themselves in WWI will never be known, appreciation has grown of horses’ wartime sacrifices as more people learn about them. In 2004, the Animals in War memorial opened in London’s Hyde Park, including the bronze sculpture of a lone, noble horse staring off into the distance.


Crisp

Crisp wit

In his book How To Go To The Movies, Quentin Crisp says that:

Opium is the religion of the people, or it was until very recently when cocaine came back into fashion, but we are told by heaps of teenagers that the ecstasies of crack only last about a quarter of an hour – hardly as long as a travelogue or an animated cartoon. A first feature lasts eight times as long. No toxic substance is the real answer. Comrade Dostoyevsky said that without tobacco or alcohol, life for most men would be intolerable, but he had never been to a double feature.

The world is pining for a steady diet of celluloid; it desperately needs an alternative life to that through which it drags itself at the office or, worse, at home. This other existence need not be prettier, but is must be richer; it must have the power to use those capacities for love and courage for which we can find no worthy object in real life.

Crisp (born Denis Charles Pratt, 25 December 1908 – 21 November 1999) was an English writer and raconteur. From a conventional suburban background Crisp grew up with feminine tendencies exemplified by his make-up and painted nails and work as a rent-boy. He then spent thirty years as a professional model for life-classes in art colleges. The interviews he gave about his unusual life attracted increasing public curiosity and he was soon sought after for his highly individual views on social manners and the cultivating of style. His one-man stage show was a long-running hit both in England and America and he also appeared in films and on TV. Read more

He states that:

The way to go to films is incessantly

The more often we visit the cinema, the more exciting the experience becomes, not the more boring. Films teach us how to see them; they are written in a language that we must learn. In a carefully constructed, well-told film, we can perceive and interpret the slightest tremor of the camera, the most fleeting glance of an actor.

 The way to go to films is reverently

We must be prepared to believe in the most improbable hypothesis, provided that it is presented to us with sufficient conviction, enough passion. We must surrender our whole beings to whatever reaction the story demands – gasping, laughing, weeping, wincing, sighing with utter abandonment.

The way to go to films is critically

We must take to each cinema two pairs of spectacles. While we plunge into each film as though it were happening to us, we must also watch it from a distance, judging it as a work of art. Thus, to seeing a film will be added an extra pleasure that can never be derived from real life, which has no plot and is so badly acted. This dual vision is especially beneficial when watching a film made in a different era. If we go to films often enough and in a sufficiently reverent spirit, they will become more absorbing than the outer world, and the problems of reality will cease to burden us.

Read Quentin Crisp’s books ‘How to go to the movies: A guide for the perplexed’, combining his love for the cinema and his notorious wit.

Treat yourself further and also read Crisp’s ‘The Naked Civil Servant’ and ‘ Resident Alien’.

I am certain you will even consider watching the film ‘The Naked Civil Servant’ once you’ve discovered Crisp’s delightfully wicked mindscape.

“The stories we tell—and the ones we don’t—shape how we see the world and ourselves. Stories can save, they can empower, they can heal, but they can also kill when truth is distorted,” says Oscar winning screenwriter Jordan Peele, who unleashes a fresh take on the blood-chilling urban legend: Candyman with filmmaker Nia DaCosta.

‘The monster of Candyman is storytelling,’” says producer Ian Cooper. “Thinking of Candyman as the manifestation of collective storytelling felt incredibly poignant to us. It felt inseparable from the cyclical nature of violence against Black people in America. The notion of hearing about something, assuming something, mishearing, misunderstanding, corroborating through misinformation, packaging all of that and then retelling it to a friend. And that friend retells it to their cousin, who retells it to their cousin’s friend. Those are the guts of an urban legend but are also what frequently spur the real-life cycle of violence in America.” 

The screenplay for Candyman was crafted by Peele (who received an Oscar for his screenplay Get Out, and also stars in Candyman) with Producer Win Rosenfeld and filmmaker Nia DaCosta.

"Get Out" director Jordan Peele at first didn't have high hopes that his horror-satire would get made.
Jordan Peele.(Produced by/Screenplay by) is an Oscar® and Emmy-Award-winning filmmaker. His first feature film, Get Out, was released in 2017 to widespread critical praise. The film earned four Academy Award® nominations and won Peele the Oscar® for Best Original Screenplay. In 2019, Peele wrote, produced and directed his second feature, Us, which instantly became a smash hit with audiences and critics alike, posting the largest box-office opening for an original horror movie ever.

Candyman, Peele says, can be seen as almost the patron saint of the urban legend. “He’s the accumulation of all of them—the Bloody Mary mirror, the hook, the razorblades in candy,” Peele says. “All of those things that you’ve heard about but didn’t know if they were true. The beauty of urban legends is they kind of shift over time, but the nuggets, the essentials, the little twists or the details will stay the same. It’s hard to say what role they serve—cautionary tales or expressions of suppressed fears amongst a community—but in the case of the Candyman legend, it’s much more of a dance between the community and what they need to protect themselves from.”

Urban legends can also reveal unexpressed truths about a place and a culture at a given moment. “Urban legends are ways of commiserating and bringing communities together,” Win Rosenfeld says.

“On one level, urban legends are here to freak us out and to enjoy the thrill of being scared with other people. But if you look deeply at almost any of them, there’s always something they’re saying about the time they come from and something resonant about the human condition. I don’t think you have to look very deeply to understand why looking in a mirror and saying the word ‘Candyman’ five times is both scary and poignant. Of course, it’s terrifying that a demon could pop out, but you’re also looking into your own eyes and taking a moment to say, ‘What is the demon inside me?’”           

Legends can also give a community a tool for coping with realities that are too much to bear.  “When legends and stories are passed down, it’s is a way of contending with the horrors that we live with day-to-day,” DaCosta says. “It’s a way of protecting ourselves and our families from the horrors that are within our communities. In all the decisions I made through the process of making this movie, I wanted to be careful with treading the line between horror for entertainment and real-life trauma. The movie speaks to the horrifying things that have happened in real-life and to the way we grieve together. It’s about the stories we tell ourselves in order to get through or to understand these situations.”

Storytelling within the film even shapes the characters in unexpected ways. The central character, Anthony McCoy, sees his art career take flight only when his identity is connected to an event that captures the public’s imagination. “Anthony may start out as a mediocre artist, but when an art dealer is brutally murdered on the opening night of his exhibition, Anthony becomes instantly more intriguing to the art world,” Peele says. “So, there’s something about Anthony that’s an exploration of the surrounding story becoming more important than the art.”

Pictured above are: director Nia DaCosta with Emmy winner Yahya Abdul-Mateen Ii; Watchmen, Us) who takes on the role of visual artist Anthony McCoy in Candyman. Anxious to maintain his status in the Chicago art world, and spurred on by his white art dealer, Anthony begins to explore these macabre details in his studio as fresh inspiration for paintings, unknowingly opening a door to a complex past that unravels his own sanity and unleashes a terrifying wave of violence that puts him on a collision course with destiny. Photo credit: Universal Pictures and MGM Pictures

The Resurrection of Candyman

Early in the process of resurrecting Candyman for a new generation, Jordan Peele and his fellow Monkeypaw producers Win Rosenfeld and Ian Cooper decided that they would bring in a fresh new voice to direct the film. They found their filmmaker in Nia DaCosta, whose first feature film, Little Woods, had impressed them with its seamless melding of character-driven narrative and complex, real-world issues.

Nia DaCosta is one of the freshest and most in-demand voices in Hollywood, having written and directed projects for stage, film and television.   DaCosta is currently in production on the highly anticipated Captain Marvel sequel, The Marvels. Directing this film makes her the first Black woman to direct a Marvel Studios picture. The superhero film, starring Brie Larson, Teyonah Parris and Iman Vellani, is scheduled to be released November 11, 2022.  

“When we were looking for a director, we wanted to find someone who could really sink into this world that we were building and work with what was ultimately becoming a character piece,” Win Rosenfeld says. “Nia’s work on Little Woods managed to play with the ideas of serious trenchant social issues in a non-didactic way, and at the same time, allowed the audience to get very close to characters who are in desperate situations. She became the perfect choice for Candyman. The amount of life that she breathed into it and how much she shaped the film can’t be overstated.”    

Peele and Rosenfeld had already begun work on the screenplay and knew the film would dive into deep waters, confronting America’s long history of white violence against Black people and exploring themes of gentrification, art, and both the destructive and transformative power of storytelling. “Jordan’s work, and everything we do at Monkeypaw, is based on the idea that audiences are smart,” Rosenfeld says. “Audiences want to be challenged and to engage. They’re okay with having the bar raised and leaving the theater with something to think about and discuss. They can have fun at a movie while also being intellectually stimulated. Hollywood can sometimes lower the bar in a desperate attempt to make more people watch their movies, but Jordan’s philosophy is the opposite. If we keep challenging people with meaningful art that’s also a good time, they’ll keep coming back.”

With DaCosta on board, the script entered a new phase as Peele, Rosenfeld and she began to work together to complete it. “Win, Nia and I developed a real synergy on the film and each of us brought something different to the table,” Peele says. “I wanted to make myself available as a resource for Nia, but it was easy to support her ownership and decisions as a director.”

The ideas behind the film are both timely and timeless.“Candyman is an exciting story to tell at any time period because it’s so perennial,” DaCosta says. “The history of violence repeats itself in cycles, and we collectively process trauma and grieve through stories, so it felt like any time could really be the right time to tell the story of Candyman. But it’s also a film that speaks directly to this moment in Black life and culture. On one level, the character of Candyman is a myth and a monster, but as we know, America creates monsters out of Black men all the time. It isn’t necessarily who they truly are … or why they are. I was interested in telling the truth about the pain at the center of Black life in America but also to shine a light on the hope and power of Black creativity and community, too.”

Photo credit: Universal Pictures and MGM Pictures

White Violence, Black Trauma -The Lived Urgency of Candyman

Candyman is, in essence, an allegory for racism in America,” Jordan Peele says. “With this film, Nia has explored race on so many levels, from the uncomfortable to the downright devastating. When an audience goes to see a horror movie, they enter a sort of contract that says, ‘I’m here to be freaked out. I’m here to be traumatized and challenged.’ What’s important and special about the genre is that it allows you to explore the real-life horrors in the world. And with Candyman, Nia has put together the seminal horror about racial violence in this country.”

In the 1992 film, a baby boy, Anthony McCoy, is kidnapped by Candyman from the Cabrini-Green apartment of his mother, Anne-Marie McCoy (Vanessa Estelle Williams). For this new film, set about 30 years later, Anthony McCoy (Yahya Abdul-Matten II) is the central character, who has grown up with no memory or knowledge of that incident from his infancy. Unaware of his own history, he moves into the now-gentrified neighborhood where Cabrini-Green once stood. When he meets William Burke (Colman Domingo), a knowledgeable old-timer who tells Anthony about the Candyman legend, Anthony doesn’t yet understand his own biographical connection to it.           

As the filmmakers developed the story, they made a pivotal decision about who Candyman was. No longer just the supernatural embodiment of Daniel Robitaille, he’s something much more painful, powerful and dangerous. “There’s not just one Black man who has been the recipient of unjust violence,” Ian Cooper says. “There’s been an unending cycle of horrifying violent acts against Black men in this neighborhood, and nationwide.” Candyman, in this film, is the embodiment of the pain, rage and wrath of countless Black men who have died at the hands of white violence. Or, as William Burke puts it in the film, “Candyman ain’t a ‘he.’ Candyman’s the whole damn hive.”

That creative decision connects Candyman not just to one man’s story from the past, but to millions of stories, past and present. “Candyman is an eternal figure,” Peele says. “He can’t just be singular. He’s a concept and a story. He’s a bogeyman, and that means that he applies across the boundaries of time. We wanted to take what was done in the original film and apply an even greater sense of urgency and demonstrate that this monster has been swept under the carpet for so long.”           

The film doesn’t just sweep it out, it rips the carpet off the floor. “Candyman is about Black death caused by white violence,” DaCosta says. “When people hear the word ‘lynching,’ it may feel like it’s from another time, from the past. What this film is saying is that it’s actually not a thing of the past. It’s happening now.”

Notably, however, the violence committed against Black bodies in the film is not depicted in live-action, and is instead expressed with haunting shadow puppetry. “I wanted to be careful and specific about how we depicted violence against Black people in the film,” DaCosta says. “The first film killed people left and right. In this film, we don’t do that. Shadow puppetry, which is such an old form of storytelling, ended up being a really useful way to do that because it connected back to the long history of the mythology of Candyman.”

Photo credit: Universal Pictures and MGM Pictures

Urban Legend, American Truth – The History of Candyman 

Releasedin the fall of 1992, Bernard Rose’s Candyman was a pivotal moment in the history of the horror genre. For the first time, a major American horror film cast a Black man as its titular character and main antagonist. He was a movie “monster” unlike any that had existed in Western pop culture before. Jordan Peele was 13 at the time. “I was a horror fan as a kid, but we didn’t have a Black Freddy Krueger or a Black Jason Voorhees,” Jordan Peele says. “So, when Candyman came along, it felt very daring and cathartic. And it was terrifying. Even though there are many examples of Black people in horror movies, this one felt particularly badass for me.”

Based on the short story “The Forbidden” by Clive Barker, the 1992 film follows a white graduate student, Helen Lyle (Virginia Madsen), who is researching her thesis on urban legends. She’s interested in a myth that has endured in Chicago’s infamous Cabrini-Green housing development.Around Cabrini-Green, people believe, if you say Candyman’s name into a mirror five times, he will appear, armed with a hook for a hand, and kill you. As Helen’s research continues, gruesome deaths follow in her wake and she uncovers the origin story behind the legend: That a Black 19th century artist, Daniel Robitaille (Tony Todd), fell in love with a young white woman whom he was painting. For this crime, a white mob lynched him. They cut off his hand, smeared him with honey and unleashed a swarm of bees on him before burning him alive. His ashes were spread in what was then the site of the Cabrini-Green development. His specter had terrorized the residents ever since.           

They watched Candyman a lot. “We adored that film,” Cooper says. “In Tony Todd’s portrayal of Candyman, we were witness to a commanding, alluring, complex, romantic, dynamic and terrifying villain gleefully embodied by a performer of color. We would recite lines verbatim, obsess over minor characters, and generally scrutinize every detail. This kind of close-textual analysis became the bedrock of our friendship and it remains the common ground on which we play and create every day we work together.”            

For all its admirable qualities, though, the 1992 film was also problematic, even for its time. Chief among its shortcomings were the unanswered question of why a Black man who had been the victim of white violence was now terrorizing a Black community, and why a white woman was at the center of this story. “The original film explored the legend of Candyman through Helen’s perspective,” Peele says. “But that movie struck me like a Black film. A movie for me. So, I wanted to make a movie that looked at this ghost story from a Black perspective.”

A Universal Release © 2020 Universal Studios and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Inc.